Week 11: Indigenous Epistemologies

 

Nicholas Galanin, Operation Geronimo, Silkscreen, 2013

    Indefinitely people think differently from one another and there is no way around this fact of life. People choose to either share their ideas or keep them a secret. Through this exchange each idea needs to be placed in a category of knowledge. To place ideas and thoughts into said category, this term is epistemology. Epistemology is used to separate opinion from fact, and epistemology is still debated in the academic fields. And there is a need from this debate because it has placed a social scale on knowledge. Margaret Kovach, an Indigenous scholar points out the difference in knowledge is how it’s used and gained through the Cree culture. 

    In her writing, “Epistemology and Research: Centering Tribal Knowledge” epistemology has an Eurocentric influence. This influence can be seen in the highest esteem of academia because all knowledge must be cut and dry, there is no wiggle room and cannot afford for a small detail to be out of place. This idea of epistemology being this way has left out the Indigenous way of thinking.  Western ideas must come through something that has to be seen, felt, or heard. “Indigenous epistemology emphasizes its “non-fragmented, holistic nature; focusing in the metaphysical and pragmatic, on language and place, and on the value of relationships”, Kovach explains. It is the fact that Cree natives believe in holistic and metaphysical as a source of information. Which in turn their culture is ignored or criticized by the western idea of knowledge. 

    The information source whether it be from “dreams, prayer, ceremony ritual, and happenings” 1 does not discredit the information gained because information must be processed through one person. And that is an idea that even western epistemology has to acknowledge because information is intertwined with a person’s culture and identity. Eurocentric societies have the tendency of looking down on other cultures that have taken in information from scared source like dreams. However, western culture also has a whole segment on dreams and it's scientific knowledge provided by the admiration of Sigmund Freud and other reputable figures. This clearly displays a hypocrisy within western culture for looking down on information gained in the same action. There can be an argument that western society sees dreams different, but both cultures deem that dreams are a guiding point to a person's identity. In turn, knowledge given through sacred sources is a legitimate way of gaining knowledge.




Bibliography

Margaret Kovach, "Epistemology and Research: Centring Tribal Knowledge," Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009).

 



Comments

  1. There are some spelling/grammatical errors in the first paragraph if you wouldn't mind proofreading a bit. There does seem to be a problem with the way the west deems what is suitable and what is not from other countries/peoples. Since you brought up Freud, what do you think would be a good way to share dreams in an academic sense outside of psychology?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ashton,

      Thank you for commenting. I think the best way to bring up dreams in an academic setting is the standards that a culture thinks differently than the main one being presented. This makes the audience and other scholars think outside of their epistemology, which holds judgment. The best way to introduce dreams into academia is through the creative process and the inception of an idea.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 7: apply and reflect

Reading Response: Social Justice and Inclusion in Musuems

Social lnjusticed: Decolonization of Museums