Week 3: Aura: Reflect
In Walter Benjamin’s essay, “Art in
the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” examined how mass production was changing
art. What was changing was the way art was being made and subsequently changed
the way art is perceived. One of the critique Benjamin, wrote about how painting
differs from film. Film has the motive to penetrate what reality is. Film involves the viewer as if they are
present, a voyager in the movie scene. They are one with the moment they are
living in the time as it passes through the movie screen. Time and space are condensed
into one. Whereas painting is a look into what is happened the moment, almost a
snapshot. With a painting a person knows
that ther environment has not changed. The moment captured will forever be just
that, a moment captured. What is interesting
about Benjamin’s perspective on film is based on the actors. Benjamin says, “the
film actor lacks the opportunity of the stage actor to adjust to the audience
during his performance, since he does not present his performance to the
audience in person.” Which in turn makes him state, “for the film, what matters
primarily is that the actor represents himself to the public before the camera,
rather than representing someone else.” This theory can be seen in, Andy Warhol Golden
Marilyn Monroe. Andy Warhol used a
publicized still from the 1953 film Niagara. Marilyn Monroe was portraying Rose
Loomis. But, most people would not know that since it is Monroe the character does
not matter. She is a cult personality. “Even as Warhol canonizes
Monroe, he reveals her public persona as a carefully structured illusion.”1
The statement confirms that Monroe was not playing character she was playing
herself. However, herself was an act too that the viewer got to interact with, and
how hold on too. Andy Warhol also confirms his analysis on how reproduction
makes the subject loose its aura. The originality of the painting does not
exist, it is no longer creative it does not hold it vaule because it is not
something new. Andy Warhol basically took the image Monroe created and he put
his signature on it. The painting no longer feels like the genuine connection with
Marlein Monroe because her original, cult personality is no longer there. Andy exploited
Marilyn Monroe.

Benjamin, Walter, Hannah Arendt, and Harry Zohn. 1969. Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
“MoMA Learning.” Accessed September 12, 2020. https://www.moma.org/learn/moma_learning/andy-warhol-gold-marilyn-monroe-1962/.
This is an interesting take. Do you believe that works of any famous person/personality is exploitation? Does it need to be a complete fabrication of the person doing something they're not known for for it to be art? What about portraiture before the camera was invented, is that not art?
ReplyDelete