Week 3 Audience
Examination of structures and the
way they have labeled what is acceptable and dismissed, such is the gift of
insight. Insight is vital for the
exploration of the furture. What is offered when a structure like the museums
look back and recognize what has happened, they give growth to the whole community.
When a structure that has limited it
audience it’s repercussion is the loss of an audience that has never participated
before. This can be seen better in the article, “Can Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s Video
Change Perception of Who Belongs in Museums?” an opinion piece written by Lisa
Ragbir. As the title suggest is that two
black icons like Beyoncé and Jay-Z influence the following they have which is mainly
black dominate which is compelled to participate. If that were the case it would be hard to
persuade others because the black community is not made up people with the money
like the Carters. Matter fact, the video is made of people that have an element
of sophistication. The Carters have money that only a few people will ever experience
in a lifetime and the dancers that are involved have the aura of classical
since they are well trained. This is where one problem can be seen. The music
has a feature by the Migos; however, they are not seen in the music video. Because
they do not hold the esteem of the sophistication. Unfortunately, they are seen
as being ratchet, a negative stereotype placed on black individuals because of,
the implication of the ghetto. But
towards the end of the article Ragbir reveals, “ to be clear, the main issue is
not luxury – which is a complex and subjective problem – but that the “Apeshit”
music video encourage us to consider the ways in which luxury factors into the
idea of who belongs in culture space.” All people deserve to be welcomed and treated
the same in the structure of museums.
In the article, “ Why the Amsterdam
Museum Will No Longer Use the Term, “Dutch Golden Age” by Brigit Katz, also display the examination that
museums need to cope with the past and stop making the same mistake of not recognizing
people or what has happened in the past. The term Dutch Golden Age, does not
show the full reality of what the 17th century of Amsterdam was. Katz, quotes Tom van Molen, to explain why the
term needs to be changed. “The term ignores the many negative sides of the 17th
century such as poverty, war, forced labor, and human trafficking.” The “Dutch Golden Age” may have been golden for
a hand full of people, this can turn off an audience that has a different view
of what the time period meant to them. Where the Amsterdam Museum copes with
the past is it moves forward to remind people about others that where alive
during that period too. Not just white males from time to time the appearance of
white woman. The Amsterdam Museum added photographs
of thirteen colored Dutch people to be placed in their “Group Portraits of the
17th century” that was once the demeaning term “Dutch Golden Age”. The insight of
the museum has given them the idea to see outside of the norm of the structure
put in place.
Typhoon as Elieser, Humberto Tan
Katz, Brigit. “Why the Amsterdam Museum Will No Longer Use the Term 'Dutch Golden Age'.” Smithsonian.com. Smithsonian Institution, September 16, 2019. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/amsterdam-museum-will-no-longer-use-term-dutch-golden-age-180973140/.
Ragbir, Lise. “Can Beyoncé and Jay-Z's Louvre Video Change Perceptions of Who Belongs in Museums?,” June 17, 2020. https://hyperallergic.com/449108/beyonce-jay-z-louvre-apeshit-museums/.

Comments
Post a Comment